Three ways to price a build
Fixed price, time-and-materials, or day rate.
| Compared on | Fixed price | Time-and-materials | Day rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who carries overrun risk | The studio. You pay the agreed number. | You. Overruns are billed. | You. Every extra day is charged. |
| Cost certainty | High on what is known, honest about what is not. | Low until the work is done. | Low, scales with time taken. |
| Flexibility | Scoped up front, changes are re-agreed. | High, change as you go. | High, direct as you go. |
| What it suits | Planning and well-understood delivery. | Genuinely exploratory or shifting work. | Short bursts and extra capacity. |
| Where it goes wrong | Padded or corner-cut if forced onto true unknowns. | Open-ended cost, weak incentive to finish. | No cap, no accountability for the outcome. |
In short: fixed price puts the overrun risk on the studio for the parts that can be known; time-and-materials suits genuinely exploratory work; day rate buys extra hands without a cap. The honest approach fixes what can be fixed and is straight about the rest.
When fixed price is wrong
Fixed price is the wrong model for genuinely exploratory R&D. Any firm that offers a fixed price on truly uncertain work is either padding the number heavily or planning to cut corners when it runs over. If your project is mostly unknowns, time-and-materials with honest checkpoints protects you better.
We will fix what can honestly be fixed and be straight about the rest, rather than quote a comforting number we cannot stand behind.
